Thursday, January 30, 2020

History Of Bloodstain Patterns Essay Example for Free

History Of Bloodstain Patterns Essay Function of bloodstain pattern analysis Bloodstain pattern interpretation/analysis has been around for many years but has only really been recognized in the past several decades. This interpretation/analysis is like a very important tool that an investigator or forensic scientist may use to help them better understand what happened or what did not happen in a case where there was bloodshed. Discoverable through the examination of bloodstain pattern The information that can be discovered or obtained when examining bloodstain patterns can help in apprehending a suspect, corroborating a witnesses statement, interrogating suspects, allowing for reconstruction of past events and lastly but probably the most important exonerating an accused. All bloodstains can provide important specifics to an event that occurred during an incident, so they are always examined. This is a very crucial part of an investigation, but it is never 100%, errors do occur. â€Å"Static Aftermath† There is such a thing called â€Å"static aftermath.† What an analyst evaluates is the static aftermath of an event; the shapes, volumes, patterns, number and size of bloodstains and their relationships to the scene. Timeline of bloodstain pattern analysis Surprisingly to me the study of bloodstain patterns has been going on since the 1800’s. On the following page is a time line showing the history of bloodstain patterns interpretation/analysis. The timeline I made begins in the 1860’s and goes through the 1970’s, not every significant moment is included on this particular timeline. 1970’s – MacDonell worked under a LEAA grant, and completed 3 different articles through the 1990’s. He has trained many in law enforcement and has developed courses to continue to train analysts. 1970’s – MacDonell worked under a LEAA grant, and completed 3 different articles through the 1990’s. He has trained many in law enforcement and has developed courses to continue to train analysts. 1863 -The Beck’s wrote â€Å"Elements of Medical Jurisprudence,† which discussed cases in which bloodstain pattern analysis was utilized. 1863 -The Beck’s wrote â€Å"Elements of Medical Jurisprudence,† which discussed cases in which bloodstain pattern analysis was utilized. 1939 – Balthazard is known for doing original research and experimentation with bloodstains and patterns. 1939 – Balthazard is known for doing original research and experimentation with bloodstains and patterns. 1882 – Professor Charles Tidy published â€Å"Legal Medicine.† 1882 – Professor Charles Tidy published â€Å"Legal Medicine.† 1955 – Dr. Kirk submitted bloodstain evidence and findings in a case; this was significant in recognition of bloodstain evidence by the legal system. 1955 – Dr. Kirk submitted bloodstain evidence and findings in a case; this was significant in recognition of bloodstain evidence by the legal system. 1895 – Piotrowski published a book concerning blood stains from blows to the head. 1895 – Piotrowski published a book concerning blood stains from blows to the head. 1880 – Henry Faulds published, â€Å"On-skin Furrows of the Hand,† described bloody fingerprints and their likely usage to identify the criminal. 1880 – Henry Faulds published, â€Å"On-skin Furrows of the Hand,† described bloody fingerprints and their likely usage to identify the criminal. 1856 Lassaigne wrote a paper that included discussion of marks that appeared to be bloodstains but was from insects. 1856 Lassaigne wrote a paper that included discussion of marks that appeared to be bloodstains but was from insects.

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

The Cheating Hearts of Men Essay -- Relationships Affairs Boyfriends E

The Cheating Hearts of Men In writing this paper, I am setting out to answer a question that has been plaguing women for many years. Why do men cheat on us? Is it something us women do that causes it? Is it something they are taught is ok somewhere along the way? Does it have to do with the fact that their genitalia are on the outside? Or is there no logical explanation in the universe for it? (I’m leaning towards the last one, but hey, that’s just me.) Men always seem to have an explanation for their behavior, or more likely, an excuse. These excuses have been known to range from blaming the woman they are cheating on to trying to get back at her for something. Having more than just some personal experience with being cheated on, I’m curious to find out what causes this relationship phenomenon. More importantly, is it me? I know I have several friends who might also stand to benefit from my â€Å"research†, and hopefully by the end of this we’ll all have some answers. To start my research, I had to look no further than in the mirror. My ex-boyfriend cheated on me several times. Whenever I would suspect him, he would always have these fabulous excuses as to what he was doing and who he was with. He was a very convincing person, and he knew that. When I finally found out the truth (from the other girl I might add, which by the way guys is the worst way to find out) his first reaction was to deny it, and then when he finally admitted to it he had the balls to blame it on me. He said it was my fault because I did not pay him enough attention and the other time was because I was spending too much time with one of my male friends and then the next excuse was because I already was accusing him of it so he might as well. He might as we... ...s that I read in my search, I honestly do believe that there is just something inherent in the nature of the male species that causes them to be more likely to be unfaithful then women. I will end this paper with a little positive note for all the guys. Just to make you all feel a little better, I also learned in my research that nowadays women are almost as likely to cheat as men are. Works Cited Carey, Benedict. â€Å"Your cheating heart; Yen for variety can strain marital bonds.† Times-Picayune 25 Oct. 2003 Charles, Nick. â€Å"Why good men cheat.† Essence Jan 2003: 104-107+. Giglio, Anthony. â€Å"Would your guy cheat? Would you know?† Redbook April 2001: 108-118. Koli, Anuradha. â€Å"Why Guys Cheat on Hot Women.† Cosmopolitan Jan 2004: 106. LaFrance, Siona. â€Å"The Cheating Kind; Men’s affairs are a symptom of deeper problems.† Times-Picayune 28 Jan. 2004.

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Antisocial personality disorder: therapy/treatment paper

According to Hare and Hart (2005) Antisocial personality disorder is one of the mental disorders which constitute a large segment of mental disorder patents.This disorder begins right from childhood and continues through adolescent to adulthood.   The main feature of the disorder as outlined by the American Psychiatric Association is continuous disregard and violation of other rights with deceit and manipulation seen as key features of the disorder.In the diagnoses of the disorder, it is usually considered accurate to take diagnostic materials from others and not specifically from the individual themselves. Individual with this disorder may exhibit symptoms ranging from lying and stealing, difficulties in obeying the law, violation of rights or others, abuse of substance, aggressive behavior and involvement in fights, lack of remorse, and many others.The disorder is also referred to as sociopathic personality disorder. In this paper we are going to explore the different therapies o r treatment that have been done or continue to be done regarding the disorder.Symptoms and diagnosisThere are many theories that try to explain the cause of this disorder but prominent genetics and environment factor have been used to explain the occurrence of the disease. The genetic theory asserts that the disease can be passed on from parents to children. It is a part of the nature and nurture debate.Environmental factors including the patterns of relationship are related to be a leading cause of the disorder. Other theories suggest abnormalities in the development of the nervous system while another theory assert that people with this disorder have a higher sensory input for normal functioning of the brain. These theories attribute the cause to brain functions.According to the DSM-IV criteria diagnoses of the disorder requires presence of three or more of the following symptoms: · Lack of conformation with respect to the social norms and laws with repeating acts leading to arr ests · Deceit with repeated lying, aliases, conning just for personal pleasure or profit ·Ã‚   Impulsivity ·Ã‚   Irritability and aggressive behavior resulting in increased physical fights ·Ã‚   Disregarding safety for others and for self ·Ã‚   Irresponsibility and lack of consistent work behavior · Un-remorsefulness resulting to indifferent rationalizing, mistreatment of othersAccording to the National Comorbidity Survey, it has been documented that using DSM-IV criteria, the disorder is prevalent in about 3% of males and about 1% of females.   However the prevalence has been found higher in some populations like prisoners including non-violent offenders and in substance abuse rehabilitation centers.Although most of the diagnoses have been found in adulthood, there are three critical tools or markers which can be used to assess children with the disorder. They include bedwetting, abusing animals and pyromania.Case studyFor his entire life, john has been incapable of l oving which means he has never loved anyone including himself. His childhood proved to be less ideal than others and his poor background could have given way to his current unhealthy emotions.However John is John and a John of many faces. He is a brilliant and manipulative John who is able to simulate and emulate love when he needs it and when he doesn’t need it s. He will act very loving but which should not be in any way confused with real love. This is when John wants to achieve something, money, food, adoration, and many others.   One the target avails his goal they are usually abandoned callously, in a cruel manner and abruptly.In man instances, there are many people who have found themselves an admirable stop over for John. They will supply all what he needs to move a step ahead to gain what he wants.   In other words, they are a source of narcissistic supply including adoration, submissive, approval, admiration, and others. John will use foul language when venting his aggression.When John is not in need, he will not contact anyone not even his girlfriend. John will not bother doing anything for other people so long as he is not benefiting from its.   John is simply suffering from antisocial personality disorder

Monday, January 6, 2020

Manhattan College Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores, GPA

Manhattan College is a private Catholic college with an acceptance rate of 75%. Located in the Riverdale neighborhood of the Bronx about 10 miles from Midtown, Manhattan College offers 50 majors and minors in 5 schools. The colleges most popular undergraduate programs are pre-professional (business, education, engineering, and communications), but the schools strengths in the liberal arts and sciences earned it a chapter of  Phi Beta Kappa Honor Society. Academics are supported by a strong 12-to-1 student / faculty ratio and an average class size of 23. In athletics, the Manhattan College Jaspers compete in the NCAA Division I  Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference  (MAAC). Considering applying to Manhattan College? Here are the admissions statistics you should know, including average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs of admitted students. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, Manhattan College had an acceptance rate of 75%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 75 students were admitted, making Manhattans admissions process somewhat competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 7,882 Percent Admitted 75% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 14% SAT Scores and Requirements Manhattan College requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 83% of admitted students submitted SAT scores. SAT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile ERW 540 630 Math 530 630 ERW=Evidence-Based Reading and Writing This admissions data tells us that most of Manhattan Colleges admitted students fall within the top 35% nationally on the SAT. The middle 50% of students admitted to Manhattan College scored between 540 and 630, while 25% scored below 540 and 25% scored above 630. On the math section, 50% of admitted students scored between 530 and 630, while 25% scored below 530 and 25% scored above 630. Applicants with a composite SAT score of 1260 or higher will have particularly competitive chances at Manhattan College. Requirements Manhattan College does not require the optional SAT essay section or SAT Subject tests. Note that Manhattan College participates in the scorechoice program, which means that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each individual section across all SAT test dates. ACT Scores and Requirements Manhattan College requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 17% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 21 28 Math 21 27 Composite 23 27 This admissions data tells us that most of Manhattans admitted students fall within the  top 31% nationally  on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to Manhattan College received a composite ACT score between 23 and 27, while 25% scored above 27 and 25% scored below 23. Requirements Note that Manhattan College does not superscore ACT results; your highest composite ACT score will be considered. Manhattan College does not require the optional ACT writing section. GPA In 2019, the middle 50% of Manhattan Colleges incoming freshmen class had high school GPAs between 3.2 to 3.8. 25% had a GPA above 3.8, and 25% had a GPA below 3.2. These results suggest that most successful applicants to Manhattan College have primarily A and B grades. Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph Manhattan College Applicants Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph. Data courtesy of Cappex. The admissions data in the graph is self-reported by applicants to Manhattan College. GPAs are unweighted. Find out how you compare to accepted students, see the real-time graph, and calculate your chances of getting in  with a free Cappex account. Admissions Chances Manhattan College, which accepts three-quarters of applicants, has a somewhat competitive admissions pool with above average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs. However, Manhattan College also has a  holistic admissions  process involving other factors beyond your grades and test scores. A  strong application  essay  and  a  glowing letter of recommendation  can strengthen your application, as can participation in  meaningful extracurricular activities  and a  rigorous course schedule. While not required, Manhattan College strongly recommends  optional interviews  for interested applicants as an opportunity to clearly  demonstrate interest in the school. Students with particularly compelling stories or achievements can still receive serious consideration even if their grades and test scores are outside Manhattan Colleges average range. In the scattergram above, the blue and green data points represent students who were admitted to Manhattan College. As you can see, most had combined SAT scores (ERWM) of 1000 or higher, an ACT composite score of 20 or higher, and a high school average of a B or better. A significant percentage of accepted students had grades in the A range.   If You Like Manhattan College, You May Also Like These Schools New York UniversityFordham UniversityPace UniversitySt. Johns UniversityHunter CollegeCCNYColumbia University All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and Manhattan College Undergraduate Admissions Office.